home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
IRIX Base Documentation 1998 November
/
IRIX 6.5.2 Base Documentation November 1998.img
/
usr
/
share
/
catman
/
u_man
/
cat1
/
perlcall.z
/
perlcall
Wrap
Text File
|
1998-10-30
|
81KB
|
2,377 lines
PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111)))) PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111))))
NNNNAAAAMMMMEEEE
perlcall - Perl calling conventions from C
DDDDEEEESSSSCCCCRRRRIIIIPPPPTTTTIIIIOOOONNNN
The purpose of this document is to show you how to call Perl subroutines
directly from C, i.e., how to write _c_a_l_l_b_a_c_k_s.
Apart from discussing the C interface provided by Perl for writing
callbacks the document uses a series of examples to show how the
interface actually works in practice. In addition some techniques for
coding callbacks are covered.
Examples where callbacks are necessary include
+o An Error Handler
You have created an XSUB interface to an application's C API.
A fairly common feature in applications is to allow you to define a
C function that will be called whenever something nasty occurs. What
we would like is to be able to specify a Perl subroutine that will
be called instead.
+o An Event Driven Program
The classic example of where callbacks are used is when writing an
event driven program like for an X windows application. In this
case you register functions to be called whenever specific events
occur, e.g., a mouse button is pressed, the cursor moves into a
window or a menu item is selected.
Although the techniques described here are applicable when embedding Perl
in a C program, this is not the primary goal of this document. There are
other details that must be considered and are specific to embedding Perl.
For details on embedding Perl in C refer to the _p_e_r_l_e_m_b_e_d manpage.
Before you launch yourself head first into the rest of this document, it
would be a good idea to have read the following two documents - the
_p_e_r_l_x_s manpage and the _p_e_r_l_g_u_t_s manpage.
TTTTHHHHEEEE PPPPEEEERRRRLLLL____CCCCAAAALLLLLLLL FFFFUUUUNNNNCCCCTTTTIIIIOOOONNNNSSSS
Although this stuff is easier to explain using examples, you first need
be aware of a few important definitions.
Perl has a number of C functions that allow you to call Perl subroutines.
They are
I32 perl_call_sv(SV* sv, I32 flags) ;
I32 perl_call_pv(char *subname, I32 flags) ;
I32 perl_call_method(char *methname, I32 flags) ;
I32 perl_call_argv(char *subname, I32 flags, register char **argv) ;
The key function is _p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l__s_v. All the other functions are fairly
simple wrappers which make it easier to call Perl subroutines in special
PPPPaaaaggggeeee 1111
PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111)))) PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111))))
cases. At the end of the day they will all call _p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l__s_v to invoke
the Perl subroutine.
All the _p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l_* functions have a flags parameter which is used to
pass a bit mask of options to Perl. This bit mask operates identically
for each of the functions. The settings available in the bit mask are
discussed in the section on _F_L_A_G _V_A_L_U_E_S.
Each of the functions will now be discussed in turn.
ppppeeeerrrrllll____ccccaaaallllllll____ssssvvvv
_p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l__s_v takes two parameters, the first, sv, is an SV*. This
allows you to specify the Perl subroutine to be called either as a C
string (which has first been converted to an SV) or a reference to a
subroutine. The section, _U_s_i_n_g _p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l__s_v, shows how you can make
use of _p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l__s_v.
ppppeeeerrrrllll____ccccaaaallllllll____ppppvvvv
The function, _p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l__p_v, is similar to _p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l__s_v except it
expects its first parameter to be a C char* which identifies the
Perl subroutine you want to call, e.g., perl_call_pv("fred", 0). If
the subroutine you want to call is in another package, just include
the package name in the string, e.g., "pkg::fred".
ppppeeeerrrrllll____ccccaaaallllllll____mmmmeeeetttthhhhoooodddd
The function _p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l__m_e_t_h_o_d is used to call a method from a Perl
class. The parameter methname corresponds to the name of the method
to be called. Note that the class that the method belongs to is
passed on the Perl stack rather than in the parameter list. This
class can be either the name of the class (for a static method) or a
reference to an object (for a virtual method). See the _p_e_r_l_o_b_j
manpage for more information on static and virtual methods and the
section on _U_s_i_n_g _p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l__m_e_t_h_o_d for an example of using
_p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l__m_e_t_h_o_d.
ppppeeeerrrrllll____ccccaaaallllllll____aaaarrrrggggvvvv
_p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l__a_r_g_v calls the Perl subroutine specified by the C string
stored in the subname parameter. It also takes the usual flags
parameter. The final parameter, argv, consists of a NULL terminated
list of C strings to be passed as parameters to the Perl subroutine.
See _U_s_i_n_g _p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l__a_r_g_v.
All the functions return an integer. This is a count of the number of
items returned by the Perl subroutine. The actual items returned by the
subroutine are stored on the Perl stack.
As a general rule you should _a_l_w_a_y_s check the return value from these
functions. Even if you are expecting only a particular number of values
to be returned from the Perl subroutine, there is nothing to stop someone
from doing something unexpected - don't say you haven't been warned.
PPPPaaaaggggeeee 2222
PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111)))) PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111))))
FFFFLLLLAAAAGGGG VVVVAAAALLLLUUUUEEEESSSS
The flags parameter in all the _p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l_* functions is a bit mask which
can consist of any combination of the symbols defined below, OR'ed
together.
GGGG____VVVVOOOOIIIIDDDD
Calls the Perl subroutine in a void context.
This flag has 2 effects:
1. It indicates to the subroutine being called that it is executing in
a void context (if it executes _w_a_n_t_a_r_r_a_y the result will be the
undefined value).
2. It ensures that nothing is actually returned from the subroutine.
The value returned by the _p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l_* function indicates how many items
have been returned by the Perl subroutine - in this case it will be 0.
GGGG____SSSSCCCCAAAALLLLAAAARRRR
Calls the Perl subroutine in a scalar context. This is the default
context flag setting for all the _p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l_* functions.
This flag has 2 effects:
1. It indicates to the subroutine being called that it is executing in
a scalar context (if it executes _w_a_n_t_a_r_r_a_y the result will be
false).
2. It ensures that only a scalar is actually returned from the
subroutine. The subroutine can, of course, ignore the _w_a_n_t_a_r_r_a_y
and return a list anyway. If so, then only the last element of the
list will be returned.
The value returned by the _p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l_* function indicates how many items
have been returned by the Perl subroutine - in this case it will be
either 0 or 1.
If 0, then you have specified the G_DISCARD flag.
If 1, then the item actually returned by the Perl subroutine will be
stored on the Perl stack - the section _R_e_t_u_r_n_i_n_g _a _S_c_a_l_a_r shows how to
access this value on the stack. Remember that regardless of how many
items the Perl subroutine returns, only the last one will be accessible
from the stack - think of the case where only one value is returned as
being a list with only one element. Any other items that were returned
will not exist by the time control returns from the _p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l_* function.
The section _R_e_t_u_r_n_i_n_g _a _l_i_s_t _i_n _a _s_c_a_l_a_r _c_o_n_t_e_x_t shows an example of this
behavior.
PPPPaaaaggggeeee 3333
PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111)))) PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111))))
GGGG____AAAARRRRRRRRAAAAYYYY
Calls the Perl subroutine in a list context.
As with G_SCALAR, this flag has 2 effects:
1. It indicates to the subroutine being called that it is executing in
an array context (if it executes _w_a_n_t_a_r_r_a_y the result will be true).
2. It ensures that all items returned from the subroutine will be
accessible when control returns from the _p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l_* function.
The value returned by the _p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l_* function indicates how many items
have been returned by the Perl subroutine.
If 0, then you have specified the G_DISCARD flag.
If not 0, then it will be a count of the number of items returned by the
subroutine. These items will be stored on the Perl stack. The section
_R_e_t_u_r_n_i_n_g _a _l_i_s_t _o_f _v_a_l_u_e_s gives an example of using the G_ARRAY flag and
the mechanics of accessing the returned items from the Perl stack.
GGGG____DDDDIIIISSSSCCCCAAAARRRRDDDD
By default, the _p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l_* functions place the items returned from by
the Perl subroutine on the stack. If you are not interested in these
items, then setting this flag will make Perl get rid of them
automatically for you. Note that it is still possible to indicate a
context to the Perl subroutine by using either G_SCALAR or G_ARRAY.
If you do not set this flag then it is _v_e_r_y important that you make sure
that any temporaries (i.e., parameters passed to the Perl subroutine and
values returned from the subroutine) are disposed of yourself. The
section _R_e_t_u_r_n_i_n_g _a _S_c_a_l_a_r gives details of how to dispose of these
temporaries explicitly and the section _U_s_i_n_g _P_e_r_l _t_o _d_i_s_p_o_s_e _o_f
_t_e_m_p_o_r_a_r_i_e_s discusses the specific circumstances where you can ignore the
problem and let Perl deal with it for you.
GGGG____NNNNOOOOAAAARRRRGGGGSSSS
Whenever a Perl subroutine is called using one of the _p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l_*
functions, it is assumed by default that parameters are to be passed to
the subroutine. If you are not passing any parameters to the Perl
subroutine, you can save a bit of time by setting this flag. It has the
effect of not creating the @_ array for the Perl subroutine.
Although the functionality provided by this flag may seem
straightforward, it should be used only if there is a good reason to do
so. The reason for being cautious is that even if you have specified the
G_NOARGS flag, it is still possible for the Perl subroutine that has been
called to think that you have passed it parameters.
PPPPaaaaggggeeee 4444
PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111)))) PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111))))
In fact, what can happen is that the Perl subroutine you have called can
access the @_ array from a previous Perl subroutine. This will occur
when the code that is executing the _p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l_* function has itself been
called from another Perl subroutine. The code below illustrates this
sub fred
{ print "@_\n" }
sub joe
{ &fred }
&joe(1,2,3) ;
This will print
1 2 3
What has happened is that fred accesses the @_ array which belongs to
joe.
GGGG____EEEEVVVVAAAALLLL
It is possible for the Perl subroutine you are calling to terminate
abnormally, e.g., by calling _d_i_e explicitly or by not actually existing.
By default, when either of these of events occurs, the process will
terminate immediately. If though, you want to trap this type of event,
specify the G_EVAL flag. It will put an _e_v_a_l { } around the subroutine
call.
Whenever control returns from the _p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l_* function you need to check
the $@ variable as you would in a normal Perl script.
The value returned from the _p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l_* function is dependent on what
other flags have been specified and whether an error has occurred. Here
are all the different cases that can occur:
+o If the _p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l_* function returns normally, then the value
returned is as specified in the previous sections.
+o If G_DISCARD is specified, the return value will always be 0.
+o If G_ARRAY is specified _a_n_d an error has occurred, the return value
will always be 0.
+o If G_SCALAR is specified _a_n_d an error has occurred, the return value
will be 1 and the value on the top of the stack will be _u_n_d_e_f. This
means that if you have already detected the error by checking $@ and
you want the program to continue, you must remember to pop the _u_n_d_e_f
from the stack.
PPPPaaaaggggeeee 5555
PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111)))) PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111))))
See _U_s_i_n_g _G__E_V_A_L for details on using G_EVAL.
GGGG____KKKKEEEEEEEEPPPPEEEERRRRRRRR
You may have noticed that using the G_EVAL flag described above will
aaaallllwwwwaaaayyyyssss clear the $@ variable and set it to a string describing the error
iff there was an error in the called code. This unqualified resetting of
$@ can be problematic in the reliable identification of errors using the
eval {} mechanism, because the possibility exists that perl will call
other code (end of block processing code, for example) between the time
the error causes $@ to be set within eval {}, and the subsequent
statement which checks for the value of $@ gets executed in the user's
script.
This scenario will mostly be applicable to code that is meant to be
called from within destructors, asynchronous callbacks, signal handlers,
__DIE__ or __WARN__ hooks, and tie functions. In such situations, you
will not want to clear $@ at all, but simply to append any new errors to
any existing value of $@.
The G_KEEPERR flag is meant to be used in conjunction with G_EVAL in
_p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l_* functions that are used to implement such code. This flag
has no effect when G_EVAL is not used.
When G_KEEPERR is used, any errors in the called code will be prefixed
with the string "\_t(in cleanup)", and appended to the current value of
$@.
The G_KEEPERR flag was introduced in Perl version 5.002.
See _U_s_i_n_g _G__K_E_E_P_E_R_R for an example of a situation that warrants the use
of this flag.
DDDDeeeetttteeeerrrrmmmmiiiinnnniiiinnnngggg tttthhhheeee CCCCoooonnnntttteeeexxxxtttt
As mentioned above, you can determine the context of the currently
executing subroutine in Perl with _w_a_n_t_a_r_r_a_y. The equivalent test can be
made in C by using the GIMME_V macro, which returns G_ARRAY if you have
been called in an array context, G_SCALAR if in a scalar context, or
G_VOID if in a void context (i.e. the return value will not be used). An
older version of this macro is called GIMME; in a void context it returns
G_SCALAR instead of G_VOID. An example of using the GIMME_V macro is
shown in section _U_s_i_n_g _G_I_M_M_E__V.
KKKKNNNNOOOOWWWWNNNN PPPPRRRROOOOBBBBLLLLEEEEMMMMSSSS
This section outlines all known problems that exist in the _p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l_*
functions.
1. If you are intending to make use of both the G_EVAL and G_SCALAR
flags in your code, use a version of Perl greater than 5.000. There
is a bug in version 5.000 of Perl which means that the combination
of these two flags will not work as described in the section _F_L_A_G
PPPPaaaaggggeeee 6666
PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111)))) PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111))))
_V_A_L_U_E_S.
Specifically, if the two flags are used when calling a subroutine
and that subroutine does not call _d_i_e, the value returned by
_p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l_* will be wrong.
2. In Perl 5.000 and 5.001 there is a problem with using _p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l_* if
the Perl sub you are calling attempts to trap a _d_i_e.
The symptom of this problem is that the called Perl sub will
continue to completion, but whenever it attempts to pass control
back to the XSUB, the program will immediately terminate.
For example, say you want to call this Perl sub
sub fred
{
eval { die "Fatal Error" ; }
print "Trapped error: $@\n"
if $@ ;
}
via this XSUB
void
Call_fred()
CODE:
PUSHMARK(sp) ;
perl_call_pv("fred", G_DISCARD|G_NOARGS) ;
fprintf(stderr, "back in Call_fred\n") ;
When Call_fred is executed it will print
Trapped error: Fatal Error
As control never returns to Call_fred, the "back in Call_fred"
string will not get printed.
To work around this problem, you can either upgrade to Perl 5.002 or
higher, or use the G_EVAL flag with _p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l_* as shown below
void
Call_fred()
CODE:
PUSHMARK(sp) ;
perl_call_pv("fred", G_EVAL|G_DISCARD|G_NOARGS) ;
fprintf(stderr, "back in Call_fred\n") ;
PPPPaaaaggggeeee 7777
PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111)))) PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111))))
EXAMPLES
Enough of the definition talk, let's have a few examples.
Perl provides many macros to assist in accessing the Perl stack.
Wherever possible, these macros should always be used when interfacing to
Perl internals. We hope this should make the code less vulnerable to any
changes made to Perl in the future.
Another point worth noting is that in the first series of examples I have
made use of only the _p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l__p_v function. This has been done to keep
the code simpler and ease you into the topic. Wherever possible, if the
choice is between using _p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l__p_v and _p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l__s_v, you should always
try to use _p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l__s_v. See _U_s_i_n_g _p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l__s_v for details.
NNNNoooo PPPPaaaarrrraaaammmmeeeetttteeeerrrrssss,,,, NNNNooootttthhhhiiiinnnngggg rrrreeeettttuuuurrrrnnnneeeedddd
This first trivial example will call a Perl subroutine, _P_r_i_n_t_U_I_D, to
print out the UID of the process.
sub PrintUID
{
print "UID is $<\n" ;
}
and here is a C function to call it
static void
call_PrintUID()
{
dSP ;
PUSHMARK(sp) ;
perl_call_pv("PrintUID", G_DISCARD|G_NOARGS) ;
}
Simple, eh.
A few points to note about this example.
1. Ignore dSP and PUSHMARK(sp) for now. They will be discussed in the
next example.
2. We aren't passing any parameters to _P_r_i_n_t_U_I_D so G_NOARGS can be
specified.
3. We aren't interested in anything returned from _P_r_i_n_t_U_I_D, so
G_DISCARD is specified. Even if _P_r_i_n_t_U_I_D was changed to return some
_v_a_l_u_e(s), having specified G_DISCARD will mean that they will be
wiped by the time control returns from _p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l__p_v.
PPPPaaaaggggeeee 8888
PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111)))) PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111))))
4. As _p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l__p_v is being used, the Perl subroutine is specified as a
C string. In this case the subroutine name has been 'hard-wired'
into the code.
5. Because we specified G_DISCARD, it is not necessary to check the
value returned from _p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l__p_v. It will always be 0.
PPPPaaaassssssssiiiinnnngggg PPPPaaaarrrraaaammmmeeeetttteeeerrrrssss
Now let's make a slightly more complex example. This time we want to call
a Perl subroutine, LeftString, which will take 2 parameters - a string
($s) and an integer ($n). The subroutine will simply print the first $n
characters of the string.
So the Perl subroutine would look like this
sub LeftString
{
my($s, $n) = @_ ;
print substr($s, 0, $n), "\n" ;
}
The C function required to call _L_e_f_t_S_t_r_i_n_g would look like this.
static void
call_LeftString(a, b)
char * a ;
int b ;
{
dSP ;
PUSHMARK(sp) ;
XPUSHs(sv_2mortal(newSVpv(a, 0)));
XPUSHs(sv_2mortal(newSViv(b)));
PUTBACK ;
perl_call_pv("LeftString", G_DISCARD);
}
Here are a few notes on the C function _c_a_l_l__L_e_f_t_S_t_r_i_n_g.
1. Parameters are passed to the Perl subroutine using the Perl stack.
This is the purpose of the code beginning with the line dSP and
ending with the line PUTBACK.
2. If you are going to put something onto the Perl stack, you need to
know where to put it. This is the purpose of the macro dSP - it
declares and initializes a _l_o_c_a_l copy of the Perl stack pointer.
All the other macros which will be used in this example require you
to have used this macro.
PPPPaaaaggggeeee 9999
PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111)))) PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111))))
The exception to this rule is if you are calling a Perl subroutine
directly from an XSUB function. In this case it is not necessary to
use the dSP macro explicitly - it will be declared for you
automatically.
3. Any parameters to be pushed onto the stack should be bracketed by
the PUSHMARK and PUTBACK macros. The purpose of these two macros,
in this context, is to count the number of parameters you are
pushing automatically. Then whenever Perl is creating the @_ array
for the subroutine, it knows how big to make it.
The PUSHMARK macro tells Perl to make a mental note of the current
stack pointer. Even if you aren't passing any parameters (like the
example shown in the section _N_o _P_a_r_a_m_e_t_e_r_s, _N_o_t_h_i_n_g _r_e_t_u_r_n_e_d) you
must still call the PUSHMARK macro before you can call any of the
_p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l_* functions - Perl still needs to know that there are no
parameters.
The PUTBACK macro sets the global copy of the stack pointer to be
the same as our local copy. If we didn't do this _p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l__p_v
wouldn't know where the two parameters we pushed were - remember
that up to now all the stack pointer manipulation we have done is
with our local copy, _n_o_t the global copy.
4. The only flag specified this time is G_DISCARD. Because we are
passing 2 parameters to the Perl subroutine this time, we have not
specified G_NOARGS.
5. Next, we come to XPUSHs. This is where the parameters actually get
pushed onto the stack. In this case we are pushing a string and an
integer.
See the section on _X_S_U_B_s _a_n_d _t_h_e _A_r_g_u_m_e_n_t _S_t_a_c_k in the _p_e_r_l_g_u_t_s
manpage for details on how the XPUSH macros work.
6. Finally, _L_e_f_t_S_t_r_i_n_g can now be called via the _p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l__p_v function.
RRRReeeettttuuuurrrrnnnniiiinnnngggg aaaa SSSSccccaaaallllaaaarrrr
Now for an example of dealing with the items returned from a Perl
subroutine.
Here is a Perl subroutine, _A_d_d_e_r, that takes 2 integer parameters and
simply returns their sum.
sub Adder
{
my($a, $b) = @_ ;
$a + $b ;
}
Because we are now concerned with the return value from _A_d_d_e_r, the C
PPPPaaaaggggeeee 11110000
PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111)))) PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111))))
function required to call it is now a bit more complex.
static void
call_Adder(a, b)
int a ;
int b ;
{
dSP ;
int count ;
ENTER ;
SAVETMPS;
PUSHMARK(sp) ;
XPUSHs(sv_2mortal(newSViv(a)));
XPUSHs(sv_2mortal(newSViv(b)));
PUTBACK ;
count = perl_call_pv("Adder", G_SCALAR);
SPAGAIN ;
if (count != 1)
croak("Big trouble\n") ;
printf ("The sum of %d and %d is %d\n", a, b, POPi) ;
PUTBACK ;
FREETMPS ;
LEAVE ;
}
Points to note this time are
1. The only flag specified this time was G_SCALAR. That means the @_
array will be created and that the value returned by _A_d_d_e_r will
still exist after the call to _p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l__p_v.
2. Because we are interested in what is returned from _A_d_d_e_r we cannot
specify G_DISCARD. This means that we will have to tidy up the Perl
stack and dispose of any temporary values ourselves. This is the
purpose of
ENTER ;
SAVETMPS ;
at the start of the function, and
FREETMPS ;
LEAVE ;
at the end. The ENTER/SAVETMPS pair creates a boundary for any
PPPPaaaaggggeeee 11111111
PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111)))) PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111))))
temporaries we create. This means that the temporaries we get rid
of will be limited to those which were created after these calls.
The FREETMPS/LEAVE pair will get rid of any values returned by the
Perl subroutine, plus it will also dump the mortal SVs we have
created. Having ENTER/SAVETMPS at the beginning of the code makes
sure that no other mortals are destroyed.
Think of these macros as working a bit like using { and } in Perl to
limit the scope of local variables.
See the section _U_s_i_n_g _P_e_r_l _t_o _d_i_s_p_o_s_e _o_f _t_e_m_p_o_r_a_r_i_e_s for details of
an alternative to using these macros.
3. The purpose of the macro SPAGAIN is to refresh the local copy of the
stack pointer. This is necessary because it is possible that the
memory allocated to the Perl stack has been reallocated whilst in
the _p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l__p_v call.
If you are making use of the Perl stack pointer in your code you
must always refresh the local copy using SPAGAIN whenever you make
use of the _p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l_* functions or any other Perl internal
function.
4. Although only a single value was expected to be returned from _A_d_d_e_r,
it is still good practice to check the return code from _p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l__p_v
anyway.
Expecting a single value is not quite the same as knowing that there
will be one. If someone modified _A_d_d_e_r to return a list and we
didn't check for that possibility and take appropriate action the
Perl stack would end up in an inconsistent state. That is something
you _r_e_a_l_l_y don't want to happen ever.
5. The POPi macro is used here to pop the return value from the stack.
In this case we wanted an integer, so POPi was used.
Here is the complete list of POP macros available, along with the
types they return.
POPs SV
POPp pointer
POPn double
POPi integer
POPl long
6. The final PUTBACK is used to leave the Perl stack in a consistent
state before exiting the function. This is necessary because when
we popped the return value from the stack with POPi it updated only
our local copy of the stack pointer. Remember, PUTBACK sets the
global stack pointer to be the same as our local copy.
PPPPaaaaggggeeee 11112222
PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111)))) PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111))))
RRRReeeettttuuuurrrrnnnniiiinnnngggg aaaa lllliiiisssstttt ooooffff vvvvaaaalllluuuueeeessss
Now, let's extend the previous example to return both the sum of the
parameters and the difference.
Here is the Perl subroutine
sub AddSubtract
{
my($a, $b) = @_ ;
($a+$b, $a-$b) ;
}
and this is the C function
static void
call_AddSubtract(a, b)
int a ;
int b ;
{
dSP ;
int count ;
ENTER ;
SAVETMPS;
PUSHMARK(sp) ;
XPUSHs(sv_2mortal(newSViv(a)));
XPUSHs(sv_2mortal(newSViv(b)));
PUTBACK ;
count = perl_call_pv("AddSubtract", G_ARRAY);
SPAGAIN ;
if (count != 2)
croak("Big trouble\n") ;
printf ("%d - %d = %d\n", a, b, POPi) ;
printf ("%d + %d = %d\n", a, b, POPi) ;
PUTBACK ;
FREETMPS ;
LEAVE ;
}
If _c_a_l_l__A_d_d_S_u_b_t_r_a_c_t is called like this
call_AddSubtract(7, 4) ;
then here is the output
PPPPaaaaggggeeee 11113333
PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111)))) PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111))))
7 - 4 = 3
7 + 4 = 11
Notes
1. We wanted array context, so G_ARRAY was used.
2. Not surprisingly POPi is used twice this time because we were
retrieving 2 values from the stack. The important thing to note is
that when using the POP* macros they come off the stack in _r_e_v_e_r_s_e
order.
RRRReeeettttuuuurrrrnnnniiiinnnngggg aaaa lllliiiisssstttt iiiinnnn aaaa ssssccccaaaallllaaaarrrr ccccoooonnnntttteeeexxxxtttt
Say the Perl subroutine in the previous section was called in a scalar
context, like this
static void
call_AddSubScalar(a, b)
int a ;
int b ;
{
dSP ;
int count ;
int i ;
ENTER ;
SAVETMPS;
PUSHMARK(sp) ;
XPUSHs(sv_2mortal(newSViv(a)));
XPUSHs(sv_2mortal(newSViv(b)));
PUTBACK ;
count = perl_call_pv("AddSubtract", G_SCALAR);
SPAGAIN ;
printf ("Items Returned = %d\n", count) ;
for (i = 1 ; i <= count ; ++i)
printf ("Value %d = %d\n", i, POPi) ;
PUTBACK ;
FREETMPS ;
LEAVE ;
}
The other modification made is that _c_a_l_l__A_d_d_S_u_b_S_c_a_l_a_r will print the
number of items returned from the Perl subroutine and their value (for
simplicity it assumes that they are integer). So if _c_a_l_l__A_d_d_S_u_b_S_c_a_l_a_r is
called
PPPPaaaaggggeeee 11114444
PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111)))) PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111))))
call_AddSubScalar(7, 4) ;
then the output will be
Items Returned = 1
Value 1 = 3
In this case the main point to note is that only the last item in the
list is returned from the subroutine, _A_d_d_S_u_b_t_r_a_c_t actually made it back
to _c_a_l_l__A_d_d_S_u_b_S_c_a_l_a_r.
RRRReeeettttuuuurrrrnnnniiiinnnngggg DDDDaaaattttaaaa ffffrrrroooommmm PPPPeeeerrrrllll vvvviiiiaaaa tttthhhheeee ppppaaaarrrraaaammmmeeeetttteeeerrrr lllliiiisssstttt
It is also possible to return values directly via the parameter list -
whether it is actually desirable to do it is another matter entirely.
The Perl subroutine, _I_n_c, below takes 2 parameters and increments each
directly.
sub Inc
{
++ $_[0] ;
++ $_[1] ;
}
and here is a C function to call it.
static void
call_Inc(a, b)
int a ;
int b ;
{
dSP ;
int count ;
SV * sva ;
SV * svb ;
ENTER ;
SAVETMPS;
sva = sv_2mortal(newSViv(a)) ;
svb = sv_2mortal(newSViv(b)) ;
PUSHMARK(sp) ;
XPUSHs(sva);
XPUSHs(svb);
PUTBACK ;
count = perl_call_pv("Inc", G_DISCARD);
PPPPaaaaggggeeee 11115555
PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111)))) PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111))))
if (count != 0)
croak ("call_Inc: expected 0 values from 'Inc', got %d\n",
count) ;
printf ("%d + 1 = %d\n", a, SvIV(sva)) ;
printf ("%d + 1 = %d\n", b, SvIV(svb)) ;
FREETMPS ;
LEAVE ;
}
To be able to access the two parameters that were pushed onto the stack
after they return from _p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l__p_v it is necessary to make a note of
their addresses - thus the two variables sva and svb.
The reason this is necessary is that the area of the Perl stack which
held them will very likely have been overwritten by something else by the
time control returns from _p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l__p_v.
UUUUssssiiiinnnngggg GGGG____EEEEVVVVAAAALLLL
Now an example using G_EVAL. Below is a Perl subroutine which computes
the difference of its 2 parameters. If this would result in a negative
result, the subroutine calls _d_i_e.
sub Subtract
{
my ($a, $b) = @_ ;
die "death can be fatal\n" if $a < $b ;
$a - $b ;
}
and some C to call it
static void
call_Subtract(a, b)
int a ;
int b ;
{
dSP ;
int count ;
ENTER ;
SAVETMPS;
PUSHMARK(sp) ;
XPUSHs(sv_2mortal(newSViv(a)));
XPUSHs(sv_2mortal(newSViv(b)));
PUTBACK ;
PPPPaaaaggggeeee 11116666
PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111)))) PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111))))
count = perl_call_pv("Subtract", G_EVAL|G_SCALAR);
SPAGAIN ;
/* Check the eval first */
if (SvTRUE(GvSV(errgv)))
{
printf ("Uh oh - %s\n", SvPV(GvSV(errgv), na)) ;
POPs ;
}
else
{
if (count != 1)
croak("call_Subtract: wanted 1 value from 'Subtract', got %d\n",
count) ;
printf ("%d - %d = %d\n", a, b, POPi) ;
}
PUTBACK ;
FREETMPS ;
LEAVE ;
}
If _c_a_l_l__S_u_b_t_r_a_c_t is called thus
call_Subtract(4, 5)
the following will be printed
Uh oh - death can be fatal
Notes
1. We want to be able to catch the _d_i_e so we have used the G_EVAL flag.
Not specifying this flag would mean that the program would terminate
immediately at the _d_i_e statement in the subroutine _S_u_b_t_r_a_c_t.
2. The code
if (SvTRUE(GvSV(errgv)))
{
printf ("Uh oh - %s\n", SvPV(GvSV(errgv), na)) ;
POPs ;
}
is the direct equivalent of this bit of Perl
print "Uh oh - $@\n" if $@ ;
errgv is a perl global of type GV * that points to the symbol table
entry containing the error. GvSV(errgv) therefore refers to the C
PPPPaaaaggggeeee 11117777
PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111)))) PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111))))
equivalent of $@.
3. Note that the stack is popped using POPs in the block where
SvTRUE(GvSV(errgv)) is true. This is necessary because whenever a
_p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l_* function invoked with G_EVAL|G_SCALAR returns an error,
the top of the stack holds the value _u_n_d_e_f. Because we want the
program to continue after detecting this error, it is essential that
the stack is tidied up by removing the _u_n_d_e_f.
UUUUssssiiiinnnngggg GGGG____KKKKEEEEEEEEPPPPEEEERRRRRRRR
Consider this rather facetious example, where we have used an XS version
of the call_Subtract example above inside a destructor:
package Foo;
sub new { bless {}, $_[0] }
sub Subtract {
my($a,$b) = @_;
die "death can be fatal" if $a < $b ;
$a - $b;
}
sub DESTROY { call_Subtract(5, 4); }
sub foo { die "foo dies"; }
package main;
eval { Foo->new->foo };
print "Saw: $@" if $@; # should be, but isn't
This example will fail to recognize that an error occurred inside the
eval {}. Here's why: the call_Subtract code got executed while perl was
cleaning up temporaries when exiting the eval block, and because
call_Subtract is implemented with _p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l__p_v using the G_EVAL flag, it
promptly reset $@. This results in the failure of the outermost test for
$@, and thereby the failure of the error trap.
Appending the G_KEEPERR flag, so that the _p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l__p_v call in
call_Subtract reads:
count = perl_call_pv("Subtract", G_EVAL|G_SCALAR|G_KEEPERR);
will preserve the error and restore reliable error handling.
UUUUssssiiiinnnngggg ppppeeeerrrrllll____ccccaaaallllllll____ssssvvvv
In all the previous examples I have 'hard-wired' the name of the Perl
subroutine to be called from C. Most of the time though, it is more
convenient to be able to specify the name of the Perl subroutine from
within the Perl script.
Consider the Perl code below
PPPPaaaaggggeeee 11118888
PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111)))) PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111))))
sub fred
{
print "Hello there\n" ;
}
CallSubPV("fred") ;
Here is a snippet of XSUB which defines _C_a_l_l_S_u_b_P_V.
void
CallSubPV(name)
char * name
CODE:
PUSHMARK(sp) ;
perl_call_pv(name, G_DISCARD|G_NOARGS) ;
That is fine as far as it goes. The thing is, the Perl subroutine can be
specified as only a string. For Perl 4 this was adequate, but Perl 5
allows references to subroutines and anonymous subroutines. This is
where _p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l__s_v is useful.
The code below for _C_a_l_l_S_u_b_S_V is identical to _C_a_l_l_S_u_b_P_V except that the
name parameter is now defined as an SV* and we use _p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l__s_v instead
of _p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l__p_v.
void
CallSubSV(name)
SV * name
CODE:
PUSHMARK(sp) ;
perl_call_sv(name, G_DISCARD|G_NOARGS) ;
Because we are using an SV to call _f_r_e_d the following can all be used
CallSubSV("fred") ;
CallSubSV(\&fred) ;
$ref = \&fred ;
CallSubSV($ref) ;
CallSubSV( sub { print "Hello there\n" } ) ;
As you can see, _p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l__s_v gives you much greater flexibility in how
you can specify the Perl subroutine.
You should note that if it is necessary to store the SV (name in the
example above) which corresponds to the Perl subroutine so that it can be
used later in the program, it not enough just to store a copy of the
pointer to the SV. Say the code above had been like this
static SV * rememberSub ;
PPPPaaaaggggeeee 11119999
PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111)))) PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111))))
void
SaveSub1(name)
SV * name
CODE:
rememberSub = name ;
void
CallSavedSub1()
CODE:
PUSHMARK(sp) ;
perl_call_sv(rememberSub, G_DISCARD|G_NOARGS) ;
The reason this is wrong is that by the time you come to use the pointer
rememberSub in CallSavedSub1, it may or may not still refer to the Perl
subroutine that was recorded in SaveSub1. This is particularly true for
these cases
SaveSub1(\&fred) ;
CallSavedSub1() ;
SaveSub1( sub { print "Hello there\n" } ) ;
CallSavedSub1() ;
By the time each of the SaveSub1 statements above have been executed, the
SV*s which corresponded to the parameters will no longer exist. Expect
an error message from Perl of the form
Can't use an undefined value as a subroutine reference at ...
for each of the CallSavedSub1 lines.
Similarly, with this code
$ref = \&fred ;
SaveSub1($ref) ;
$ref = 47 ;
CallSavedSub1() ;
you can expect one of these messages (which you actually get is dependent
on the version of Perl you are using)
Not a CODE reference at ...
Undefined subroutine &main::47 called ...
The variable $ref may have referred to the subroutine fred whenever the
call to SaveSub1 was made but by the time CallSavedSub1 gets called it
now holds the number 47. Because we saved only a pointer to the original
SV in SaveSub1, any changes to $ref will be tracked by the pointer
rememberSub. This means that whenever CallSavedSub1 gets called, it will
attempt to execute the code which is referenced by the SV* rememberSub.
In this case though, it now refers to the integer 47, so expect Perl to
complain loudly.
PPPPaaaaggggeeee 22220000
PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111)))) PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111))))
A similar but more subtle problem is illustrated with this code
$ref = \&fred ;
SaveSub1($ref) ;
$ref = \&joe ;
CallSavedSub1() ;
This time whenever CallSavedSub1 get called it will execute the Perl
subroutine joe (assuming it exists) rather than fred as was originally
requested in the call to SaveSub1.
To get around these problems it is necessary to take a full copy of the
SV. The code below shows SaveSub2 modified to do that
static SV * keepSub = (SV*)NULL ;
void
SaveSub2(name)
SV * name
CODE:
/* Take a copy of the callback */
if (keepSub == (SV*)NULL)
/* First time, so create a new SV */
keepSub = newSVsv(name) ;
else
/* Been here before, so overwrite */
SvSetSV(keepSub, name) ;
void
CallSavedSub2()
CODE:
PUSHMARK(sp) ;
perl_call_sv(keepSub, G_DISCARD|G_NOARGS) ;
To avoid creating a new SV every time SaveSub2 is called, the function
first checks to see if it has been called before. If not, then space for
a new SV is allocated and the reference to the Perl subroutine, name is
copied to the variable keepSub in one operation using newSVsv.
Thereafter, whenever SaveSub2 is called the existing SV, keepSub, is
overwritten with the new value using SvSetSV.
UUUUssssiiiinnnngggg ppppeeeerrrrllll____ccccaaaallllllll____aaaarrrrggggvvvv
Here is a Perl subroutine which prints whatever parameters are passed to
it.
sub PrintList
{
my(@list) = @_ ;
foreach (@list) { print "$_\n" }
}
PPPPaaaaggggeeee 22221111
PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111)))) PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111))))
and here is an example of _p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l__a_r_g_v which will call _P_r_i_n_t_L_i_s_t.
static char * words[] = {"alpha", "beta", "gamma", "delta", NULL} ;
static void
call_PrintList()
{
dSP ;
perl_call_argv("PrintList", G_DISCARD, words) ;
}
Note that it is not necessary to call PUSHMARK in this instance. This is
because _p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l__a_r_g_v will do it for you.
UUUUssssiiiinnnngggg ppppeeeerrrrllll____ccccaaaallllllll____mmmmeeeetttthhhhoooodddd
Consider the following Perl code
{
package Mine ;
sub new
{
my($type) = shift ;
bless [@_]
}
sub Display
{
my ($self, $index) = @_ ;
print "$index: $$self[$index]\n" ;
}
sub PrintID
{
my($class) = @_ ;
print "This is Class $class version 1.0\n" ;
}
}
It implements just a very simple class to manage an array. Apart from
the constructor, new, it declares methods, one static and one virtual.
The static method, PrintID, prints out simply the class name and a
version number. The virtual method, Display, prints out a single element
of the array. Here is an all Perl example of using it.
$a = new Mine ('red', 'green', 'blue') ;
$a->Display(1) ;
PrintID Mine;
will print
PPPPaaaaggggeeee 22222222
PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111)))) PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111))))
1: green
This is Class Mine version 1.0
Calling a Perl method from C is fairly straightforward. The following
things are required
+o a reference to the object for a virtual method or the name of the
class for a static method.
+o the name of the method.
+o any other parameters specific to the method.
Here is a simple XSUB which illustrates the mechanics of calling both the
PrintID and Display methods from C.
void
call_Method(ref, method, index)
SV * ref
char * method
int index
CODE:
PUSHMARK(sp);
XPUSHs(ref);
XPUSHs(sv_2mortal(newSViv(index))) ;
PUTBACK;
perl_call_method(method, G_DISCARD) ;
void
call_PrintID(class, method)
char * class
char * method
CODE:
PUSHMARK(sp);
XPUSHs(sv_2mortal(newSVpv(class, 0))) ;
PUTBACK;
perl_call_method(method, G_DISCARD) ;
So the methods PrintID and Display can be invoked like this
$a = new Mine ('red', 'green', 'blue') ;
call_Method($a, 'Display', 1) ;
call_PrintID('Mine', 'PrintID') ;
The only thing to note is that in both the static and virtual methods,
the method name is not passed via the stack - it is used as the first
parameter to _p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l__m_e_t_h_o_d.
PPPPaaaaggggeeee 22223333
PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111)))) PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111))))
UUUUssssiiiinnnngggg GGGGIIIIMMMMMMMMEEEE____VVVV
Here is a trivial XSUB which prints the context in which it is currently
executing.
void
PrintContext()
CODE:
I32 gimme = GIMME_V;
if (gimme == G_VOID)
printf ("Context is Void\n") ;
else if (gimme == G_SCALAR)
printf ("Context is Scalar\n") ;
else
printf ("Context is Array\n") ;
and here is some Perl to test it
PrintContext ;
$a = PrintContext ;
@a = PrintContext ;
The output from that will be
Context is Void
Context is Scalar
Context is Array
UUUUssssiiiinnnngggg PPPPeeeerrrrllll ttttoooo ddddiiiissssppppoooosssseeee ooooffff tttteeeemmmmppppoooorrrraaaarrrriiiieeeessss
In the examples given to date, any temporaries created in the callback
(i.e., parameters passed on the stack to the _p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l_* function or
values returned via the stack) have been freed by one of these methods
+o specifying the G_DISCARD flag with _p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l_*.
+o explicitly disposed of using the ENTER/SAVETMPS - FREETMPS/LEAVE
pairing.
There is another method which can be used, namely letting Perl do it for
you automatically whenever it regains control after the callback has
terminated. This is done by simply not using the
ENTER ;
SAVETMPS ;
...
FREETMPS ;
LEAVE ;
sequence in the callback (and not, of course, specifying the G_DISCARD
flag).
PPPPaaaaggggeeee 22224444
PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111)))) PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111))))
If you are going to use this method you have to be aware of a possible
memory leak which can arise under very specific circumstances. To
explain these circumstances you need to know a bit about the flow of
control between Perl and the callback routine.
The examples given at the start of the document (an error handler and an
event driven program) are typical of the two main sorts of flow control
that you are likely to encounter with callbacks. There is a very
important distinction between them, so pay attention.
In the first example, an error handler, the flow of control could be as
follows. You have created an interface to an external library. Control
can reach the external library like this
perl --> XSUB --> external library
Whilst control is in the library, an error condition occurs. You have
previously set up a Perl callback to handle this situation, so it will
get executed. Once the callback has finished, control will drop back to
Perl again. Here is what the flow of control will be like in that
situation
perl --> XSUB --> external library
...
error occurs
...
external library --> perl_call --> perl
|
perl <-- XSUB <-- external library <-- perl_call <----+
After processing of the error using _p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l_* is completed, control
reverts back to Perl more or less immediately.
In the diagram, the further right you go the more deeply nested the scope
is. It is only when control is back with perl on the extreme left of the
diagram that you will have dropped back to the enclosing scope and any
temporaries you have left hanging around will be freed.
In the second example, an event driven program, the flow of control will
be more like this
PPPPaaaaggggeeee 22225555
PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111)))) PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111))))
perl --> XSUB --> event handler
...
event handler --> perl_call --> perl
|
event handler <-- perl_call <----+
...
event handler --> perl_call --> perl
|
event handler <-- perl_call <----+
...
event handler --> perl_call --> perl
|
event handler <-- perl_call <----+
In this case the flow of control can consist of only the repeated
sequence
event handler --> perl_call --> perl
for practically the complete duration of the program. This means that
control may _n_e_v_e_r drop back to the surrounding scope in Perl at the
extreme left.
So what is the big problem? Well, if you are expecting Perl to tidy up
those temporaries for you, you might be in for a long wait. For Perl to
dispose of your temporaries, control must drop back to the enclosing
scope at some stage. In the event driven scenario that may never happen.
This means that as time goes on, your program will create more and more
temporaries, none of which will ever be freed. As each of these
temporaries consumes some memory your program will eventually consume all
the available memory in your system - kapow!
So here is the bottom line - if you are sure that control will revert
back to the enclosing Perl scope fairly quickly after the end of your
callback, then it isn't absolutely necessary to dispose explicitly of any
temporaries you may have created. Mind you, if you are at all uncertain
about what to do, it doesn't do any harm to tidy up anyway.
SSSSttttrrrraaaatttteeeeggggiiiieeeessss ffffoooorrrr ssssttttoooorrrriiiinnnngggg CCCCaaaallllllllbbbbaaaacccckkkk CCCCoooonnnntttteeeexxxxtttt IIIInnnnffffoooorrrrmmmmaaaattttiiiioooonnnn
Potentially one of the trickiest problems to overcome when designing a
callback interface can be figuring out how to store the mapping between
the C callback function and the Perl equivalent.
To help understand why this can be a real problem first consider how a
callback is set up in an all C environment. Typically a C API will
provide a function to register a callback. This will expect a pointer to
a function as one of its parameters. Below is a call to a hypothetical
function register_fatal which registers the C function to get called when
a fatal error occurs.
PPPPaaaaggggeeee 22226666
PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111)))) PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111))))
register_fatal(cb1) ;
The single parameter cb1 is a pointer to a function, so you must have
defined cb1 in your code, say something like this
static void
cb1()
{
printf ("Fatal Error\n") ;
exit(1) ;
}
Now change that to call a Perl subroutine instead
static SV * callback = (SV*)NULL;
static void
cb1()
{
dSP ;
PUSHMARK(sp) ;
/* Call the Perl sub to process the callback */
perl_call_sv(callback, G_DISCARD) ;
}
void
register_fatal(fn)
SV * fn
CODE:
/* Remember the Perl sub */
if (callback == (SV*)NULL)
callback = newSVsv(fn) ;
else
SvSetSV(callback, fn) ;
/* register the callback with the external library */
register_fatal(cb1) ;
where the Perl equivalent of register_fatal and the callback it
registers, pcb1, might look like this
# Register the sub pcb1
register_fatal(\&pcb1) ;
sub pcb1
{
die "I'm dying...\n" ;
}
The mapping between the C callback and the Perl equivalent is stored in
PPPPaaaaggggeeee 22227777
PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111)))) PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111))))
the global variable callback.
This will be adequate if you ever need to have only one callback
registered at any time. An example could be an error handler like the
code sketched out above. Remember though, repeated calls to
register_fatal will replace the previously registered callback function
with the new one.
Say for example you want to interface to a library which allows
asynchronous file i/o. In this case you may be able to register a
callback whenever a read operation has completed. To be of any use we
want to be able to call separate Perl subroutines for each file that is
opened. As it stands, the error handler example above would not be
adequate as it allows only a single callback to be defined at any time.
What we require is a means of storing the mapping between the opened file
and the Perl subroutine we want to be called for that file.
Say the i/o library has a function asynch_read which associates a C
function ProcessRead with a file handle fh - this assumes that it has
also provided some routine to open the file and so obtain the file
handle.
asynch_read(fh, ProcessRead)
This may expect the C _P_r_o_c_e_s_s_R_e_a_d function of this form
void
ProcessRead(fh, buffer)
int fh ;
char * buffer ;
{
...
}
To provide a Perl interface to this library we need to be able to map
between the fh parameter and the Perl subroutine we want called. A hash
is a convenient mechanism for storing this mapping. The code below shows
a possible implementation
static HV * Mapping = (HV*)NULL ;
void
asynch_read(fh, callback)
int fh
SV * callback
CODE:
/* If the hash doesn't already exist, create it */
if (Mapping == (HV*)NULL)
Mapping = newHV() ;
/* Save the fh -> callback mapping */
hv_store(Mapping, (char*)&fh, sizeof(fh), newSVsv(callback), 0) ;
PPPPaaaaggggeeee 22228888
PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111)))) PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111))))
/* Register with the C Library */
asynch_read(fh, asynch_read_if) ;
and asynch_read_if could look like this
static void
asynch_read_if(fh, buffer)
int fh ;
char * buffer ;
{
dSP ;
SV ** sv ;
/* Get the callback associated with fh */
sv = hv_fetch(Mapping, (char*)&fh , sizeof(fh), FALSE) ;
if (sv == (SV**)NULL)
croak("Internal error...\n") ;
PUSHMARK(sp) ;
XPUSHs(sv_2mortal(newSViv(fh))) ;
XPUSHs(sv_2mortal(newSVpv(buffer, 0))) ;
PUTBACK ;
/* Call the Perl sub */
perl_call_sv(*sv, G_DISCARD) ;
}
For completeness, here is asynch_close. This shows how to remove the
entry from the hash Mapping.
void
asynch_close(fh)
int fh
CODE:
/* Remove the entry from the hash */
(void) hv_delete(Mapping, (char*)&fh, sizeof(fh), G_DISCARD) ;
/* Now call the real asynch_close */
asynch_close(fh) ;
So the Perl interface would look like this
sub callback1
{
my($handle, $buffer) = @_ ;
}
# Register the Perl callback
asynch_read($fh, \&callback1) ;
asynch_close($fh) ;
PPPPaaaaggggeeee 22229999
PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111)))) PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111))))
The mapping between the C callback and Perl is stored in the global hash
Mapping this time. Using a hash has the distinct advantage that it allows
an unlimited number of callbacks to be registered.
What if the interface provided by the C callback doesn't contain a
parameter which allows the file handle to Perl subroutine mapping? Say
in the asynchronous i/o package, the callback function gets passed only
the buffer parameter like this
void
ProcessRead(buffer)
char * buffer ;
{
...
}
Without the file handle there is no straightforward way to map from the C
callback to the Perl subroutine.
In this case a possible way around this problem is to predefine a series
of C functions to act as the interface to Perl, thus
#define MAX_CB 3
#define NULL_HANDLE -1
typedef void (*FnMap)() ;
struct MapStruct {
FnMap Function ;
SV * PerlSub ;
int Handle ;
} ;
static void fn1() ;
static void fn2() ;
static void fn3() ;
static struct MapStruct Map [MAX_CB] =
{
{ fn1, NULL, NULL_HANDLE },
{ fn2, NULL, NULL_HANDLE },
{ fn3, NULL, NULL_HANDLE }
} ;
static void
Pcb(index, buffer)
int index ;
char * buffer ;
{
dSP ;
PPPPaaaaggggeeee 33330000
PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111)))) PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111))))
PUSHMARK(sp) ;
XPUSHs(sv_2mortal(newSVpv(buffer, 0))) ;
PUTBACK ;
/* Call the Perl sub */
perl_call_sv(Map[index].PerlSub, G_DISCARD) ;
}
static void
fn1(buffer)
char * buffer ;
{
Pcb(0, buffer) ;
}
static void
fn2(buffer)
char * buffer ;
{
Pcb(1, buffer) ;
}
static void
fn3(buffer)
char * buffer ;
{
Pcb(2, buffer) ;
}
void
array_asynch_read(fh, callback)
int fh
SV * callback
CODE:
int index ;
int null_index = MAX_CB ;
/* Find the same handle or an empty entry */
for (index = 0 ; index < MAX_CB ; ++index)
{
if (Map[index].Handle == fh)
break ;
if (Map[index].Handle == NULL_HANDLE)
null_index = index ;
}
if (index == MAX_CB && null_index == MAX_CB)
croak ("Too many callback functions registered\n") ;
if (index == MAX_CB)
index = null_index ;
PPPPaaaaggggeeee 33331111
PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111)))) PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111))))
/* Save the file handle */
Map[index].Handle = fh ;
/* Remember the Perl sub */
if (Map[index].PerlSub == (SV*)NULL)
Map[index].PerlSub = newSVsv(callback) ;
else
SvSetSV(Map[index].PerlSub, callback) ;
asynch_read(fh, Map[index].Function) ;
void
array_asynch_close(fh)
int fh
CODE:
int index ;
/* Find the file handle */
for (index = 0; index < MAX_CB ; ++ index)
if (Map[index].Handle == fh)
break ;
if (index == MAX_CB)
croak ("could not close fh %d\n", fh) ;
Map[index].Handle = NULL_HANDLE ;
SvREFCNT_dec(Map[index].PerlSub) ;
Map[index].PerlSub = (SV*)NULL ;
asynch_close(fh) ;
In this case the functions fn1, fn2, and fn3 are used to remember the
Perl subroutine to be called. Each of the functions holds a separate
hard-wired index which is used in the function Pcb to access the Map
array and actually call the Perl subroutine.
There are some obvious disadvantages with this technique.
Firstly, the code is considerably more complex than with the previous
example.
Secondly, there is a hard-wired limit (in this case 3) to the number of
callbacks that can exist simultaneously. The only way to increase the
limit is by modifying the code to add more functions and then
recompiling. None the less, as long as the number of functions is chosen
with some care, it is still a workable solution and in some cases is the
only one available.
To summarize, here are a number of possible methods for you to consider
for storing the mapping between C and the Perl callback
PPPPaaaaggggeeee 33332222
PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111)))) PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111))))
1. Ignore the problem - Allow only 1 callback
For a lot of situations, like interfacing to an error handler, this
may be a perfectly adequate solution.
2. Create a sequence of callbacks - hard wired limit
If it is impossible to tell from the parameters passed back from the
C callback what the context is, then you may need to create a
sequence of C callback interface functions, and store pointers to
each in an array.
3. Use a parameter to map to the Perl callback
A hash is an ideal mechanism to store the mapping between C and
Perl.
AAAAlllltttteeeerrrrnnnnaaaatttteeee SSSSttttaaaacccckkkk MMMMaaaannnniiiippppuuuullllaaaattttiiiioooonnnn
Although I have made use of only the POP* macros to access values
returned from Perl subroutines, it is also possible to bypass these
macros and read the stack using the ST macro (See the _p_e_r_l_x_s manpage for
a full description of the ST macro).
Most of the time the POP* macros should be adequate, the main problem
with them is that they force you to process the returned values in
sequence. This may not be the most suitable way to process the values in
some cases. What we want is to be able to access the stack in a random
order. The ST macro as used when coding an XSUB is ideal for this
purpose.
The code below is the example given in the section _R_e_t_u_r_n_i_n_g _a _l_i_s_t _o_f
_v_a_l_u_e_s recoded to use ST instead of POP*.
static void
call_AddSubtract2(a, b)
int a ;
int b ;
{
dSP ;
I32 ax ;
int count ;
ENTER ;
SAVETMPS;
PUSHMARK(sp) ;
XPUSHs(sv_2mortal(newSViv(a)));
XPUSHs(sv_2mortal(newSViv(b)));
PUTBACK ;
count = perl_call_pv("AddSubtract", G_ARRAY);
PPPPaaaaggggeeee 33333333
PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111)))) PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111))))
SPAGAIN ;
sp -= count ;
ax = (sp - stack_base) + 1 ;
if (count != 2)
croak("Big trouble\n") ;
printf ("%d + %d = %d\n", a, b, SvIV(ST(0))) ;
printf ("%d - %d = %d\n", a, b, SvIV(ST(1))) ;
PUTBACK ;
FREETMPS ;
LEAVE ;
}
Notes
1. Notice that it was necessary to define the variable ax. This is
because the ST macro expects it to exist. If we were in an XSUB it
would not be necessary to define ax as it is already defined for
you.
2. The code
SPAGAIN ;
sp -= count ;
ax = (sp - stack_base) + 1 ;
sets the stack up so that we can use the ST macro.
3. Unlike the original coding of this example, the returned values are
not accessed in reverse order. So ST(0) refers to the first value
returned by the Perl subroutine and ST(count-1) refers to the last.
CCCCrrrreeeeaaaattttiiiinnnngggg aaaannnndddd ccccaaaalllllllliiiinnnngggg aaaannnn aaaannnnoooonnnnyyyymmmmoooouuuussss ssssuuuubbbbrrrroooouuuuttttiiiinnnneeee iiiinnnn CCCC
As we've already shown, the _p_e_r_l__c_a_l_l__s_v manpage can be used to invoke an
anonymous subroutine. However, our example showed how Perl script
invoking an XSUB to preform this operation. Let's see how it can be done
inside our C code:
...
SV *cvrv = perl_eval_pv("sub { print 'You will not find me cluttering any namespace!' }", TRUE);
...
perl_call_sv(cvrv, G_VOID|G_NOARGS);
the perl_eval_pv entry in the _p_e_r_l_g_u_t_s manpage is used to compile the
anonymous subroutine, which will be the return value as well. Once this
code reference is in hand, it can be mixed in with all the previous
PPPPaaaaggggeeee 33334444
PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111)))) PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111))))
examples we've shown.
SSSSEEEEEEEE AAAALLLLSSSSOOOO
the _p_e_r_l_x_s manpage, the _p_e_r_l_g_u_t_s manpage, the _p_e_r_l_e_m_b_e_d manpage
AAAAUUUUTTTTHHHHOOOORRRR
Paul Marquess <_p_m_a_r_q_u_e_s_s@_b_f_s_e_c._b_t._c_o._u_k>
Special thanks to the following people who assisted in the creation of
the document.
Jeff Okamoto, Tim Bunce, Nick Gianniotis, Steve Kelem, Gurusamy Sarathy
and Larry Wall.
DDDDAAAATTTTEEEE
Version 1.3, 14th Apr 1997
PPPPaaaaggggeeee 33335555
PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111)))) PPPPEEEERRRRLLLLCCCCAAAALLLLLLLL((((1111))))
PPPPaaaaggggeeee 33336666
